American soldiers in Vietnam quickly realized black market AK-47s were more suitable for harsh jungle warfare than their standard issue M16 rifle

Photo Credit: Bettmann / Getty Images
Photo Credit: Bettmann / Getty Images

The M16 rifle was introduced during the Vietnam War as a modern solution for U.S. troops operating in the challenging terrain of Southeast Asia. Designed for lightweight maneuverability and rapid fire, it was expected to outperform older models. However, the weapon quickly gained a negative reputation among soldiers due to frequent malfunctions—especially jamming and failure to fire—issues that often arose during critical moments in battle.

These reliability problems severely undermined trust in the M16. Frustrated and desperate for dependable firepower, some American troops began acquiring AK-47s—favored by the enemy—through black market channels. Renowned for its rugged construction and consistent performance, the AK-47 became a preferred alternative for soldiers who felt let down by their standard-issue weapon.

Adoption of the M16 rifle in Vietnam

In 1966, Gen. William Westmoreland, Commander of the US Forces in Vietnam, introduced the M16 rifle as the new standard-issue infantry rifle, replacing its predecessor, the M14. Developed by engineer Eugene Stoner in the late 1950s, it was favored for its accuracy, light weight and the amount of fire it provided.

US soldier holding an M16 rifle
US Army soldier with the 1st Cavalry Division holding an M16 rifle during a patrol, January 1971. (Photo Credit: Christopher Jensen / Getty Images)

American troops in Vietnam were given a modified version of the M16, variant XM16E1. The weapon’s adoption was largely in response to the high number of casualties resulting from the enemy’s use of AK-47s. However, controversy surrounding the efficacy of the M16 prevented it from being issued to troops stationed in Europe and the US.

The M16 rifle jammed… A lot

The first versions of the M16 rifles had serious problems. One common issue was a “failure to extract,” which caused the gun to jam during combat. Often, the empty cartridge would get stuck in the chamber after firing. In modern warfare, the M16 sometimes worked more like an old-fashioned single-shot musket.

Reporter firing an M16 rifle.
United Press International reporter Betsy Halstead learns how to fire an M-16 automatic rifle while at the Khe Sahn special forces camp during the Vietnam War. (Photo Credits: Bettmann / Getty Images).

The only way soldiers could reliably fix the problem was by using a metal rod inserted through the barrel to remove the stuck cartridge.

The M16 was still seen as more effective than the M14

It was later found that the jamming problem was caused by switching to ball powder, which was meant to boost the muzzle velocity to 3,250 feet per second.

Spent shell casings in the sand
Spent shell casings from M16 rifles at the Fort Dix firing range, New Jersey, 1967. (Photo Credit: Leif Skoogfors / Getty Images)

Even with these problems, the M16 was still seen as better than the M14. In fact, the US Army even called it the best rifle for combat in Vietnam. To fix the issues, they improved training, adjusted the gunpowder formula, and made sure cleaning kits were widely available—but not before a Congressional report brought attention to the problems.

A harrowing report is released

In 1967, nearly 80 percent of the 1,585 soldiers surveyed reported having stoppage issues with the M16 rifle during combat. Many of these soldiers wrote letters to their families, voicing concerns about the weapon’s reliability. In response, their families sent these letters to members of Congress, bringing the issue to the attention of the House Armed Services Committee.

US soldier holding an M16 rifle
Rifleman with the 1st Cavalry Division holding an M16 rifle, October 1967. (Photo Credit: Bettmann / Getty Images)

This approach worked, leading to the formation of a Congressional Subcommittee to investigate the M16. After a detailed review, the committee’s report confirmed the soldiers’ complaints. It found that the Army had failed to provide proper training on the new rifle, did not ensure the ammunition was compatible, and neglected to supply enough cleaning kits to prevent jamming.

Despite these findings, the military continued issuing the M16 to soldiers. As reliability problems persisted, many service members in Vietnam lost trust in the weapon and began looking for alternatives.

Picking up the AK-47

During the Vietnam War, numerous American soldiers found themselves favoring the AK-47—the primary weapon used by the People’s Army of Vietnam and the Viet Cong—over their own issued rifles. In the 1950s, China acquired the design and began manufacturing a local version known as the Type 56 or AK-56. This variant was slightly lighter and more compact than the original Soviet model and could operate in both fully automatic and semi-automatic modes.

The AK-47 earned a strong reputation for being rugged, easy to maintain, and highly reliable under harsh battlefield conditions. Its simple design allowed even inexperienced users to become proficient quickly, which made it particularly appealing in the unforgiving environment of jungle warfare.

US Marine holding an AK-47
US Marine who survived an ambush with a bullet-nicked ear and a captured Viet Cong AK-47, December 4, 1967. (Photo Credit: Ed Palm Photo / Getty Images)

Faced with repeated issues using the early M16—particularly its frequent jamming under combat stress—many U.S. troops saw switching to the AK-47 as a practical decision that could save lives. The rifle’s dependability led to a growing black market among American forces, who would trade for captured weapons or purchase them illicitly. Despite widespread complaints from the field, military leadership largely stood by the M16, blaming most problems on user error and inadequate cleaning rather than on the rifle’s early design flaws.

Samantha Franco

Samantha Franco is a content writer with a BA and MA in history, focusing on Victorian, medical, and epidemiological history. She has written content for multiple sites covering an array of historical topics.