Promotion And Controversy – The Meteoric Rise Of US General Mark W. Clark

Granted, many in modern Texas may have never heard of General Mark W. Clark, also known as General Marcus Aurelius Clarkus by his subordinates.  But for a period after World War 2, the State of Texas wanted nothing to do with the youngest man to be promoted to Lieutenant General in World War 2.

Many would deride him as inexperienced and out of his depth, but that wouldn’t stop the man from rising through the ranks to eventually become a full General by the end of World War 2 and the Far East Commander in the ensuing Korean War.  Whether he was tactically sound or just politically proficient has become fodder for historians to debate.

However, what is beyond dispute is that if the man were to step foot in the state of Texas in the years after World War 2, he better be ready for a Texas-sized fight.

A Quick Rise to Power

For all the controversy, this is a man who fought in every major war of the first part of the 20th century.  From such experience comes a certain amount of knowledge that hardly makes one a novice in the art of war.  In fact, many would claim General Clark was simply typical of a rapidly expanding Army finding its way during World War 2.

General Clark off the coast of Italy via commons.wikimedia.org
General Clark off the coast of Italy

It was his meteoric rise through the ranks that singled him out, and when he made the type of mistakes that many Generals make, his youth and inexperience were often brought to the surface.

He began his military career at West Point and graduated in April of 1917 a 2nd Lieutenant just in time to get in on the action of World War 1.  And as would be the pattern for his career, he rose quickly through the ranks to become a 1st Lieutenant in May and a Captain by August of 1917.

Serving with the US 11th Infantry, he would be wounded in action while fighting in the Vosges Mountains area and spent the rest of the war recovering and was subsequently transferred to the General Staff Headquarters of the First US Army.  He would later serve with the Third Army during its occupation of Germany.

Between the wars, General Clark would serve in a variety of training and staff officer roles for the Army.  In what would be his longest stretch without a promotion, he was finally promoted to Major in 1933 which came 15 years after his promotion to Captain.  However, he would quickly make up for lost time, and before the US fired their first shots of World War 2, Clark would pin on his first star in August of 1941.

Clark being awarded the Distinguished Service Cross by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in Castelvetrano, Italy (Wikipedia / Public Domain)
Clark being awarded the Distinguished Service Cross by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in Castelvetrano, Italy

An Outspoken and Politically Skilled Officer

For better or worse, the Army hierarchy seemed to embrace General Clark’s administrative abilities.  As the Army rapidly expanded and new commands were created, General Clark would always find a role in the top echelon of the command structure.  However, General Clark certainly seemed to have a desire to make a name for himself in combat and in June of 1942, he went to Europe as Commanding General of II Corps.

Offloading Jeeps at the beaches of Salerno in 1943 via commons.wikimedia.org
Offloading Jeeps at the beaches of Salerno in 1943

In typical Clark fashion, he was promoted to Major General in August of 1942 and then Lieutenant General by November of the same year.

George Smith Patton, Henry H. Arnold and Mark Wayne Clark in 1943 (Wikipedia / Public Domain)
George Smith Patton, Henry H. Arnold and Mark Wayne Clark in 1943

Despite just being a Lieutenant Colonel a little over a year prior, General Clark would be given command of the newly created US Fifth Army and tasked with preparing for the invasion of Italy.  It was in this campaign that General Clark would see his greatest controversy and find himself regularly at odds with his British counterparts.

On September 9th,  1943, Clark’s Fifth Army made their landings at Salerno, and while they met initial success despite fierce resistance, they became bogged down and failed to advance quickly.

The Germans meanwhile were masking troop movements for a massive counteroffensive that would take place on September 13th.  This German attack was nearly successful in crushing the landing, but Clark’s men were able to fend it off at a high cost.  General Clark was regularly seen in some of the most forward positions during this action and as a result, he was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross for his frontline leadership.

However, British military leadership would blame Clark’s poor planning and execution for the difficulties and high casualties at Salerno.  But leave it to the consummate politician/General to walk away with an award out of this ordeal.

Clark signing the Korean Armistice Agreement on July 27, 1953 (Public Domain / Wikipedia)
Clark signing the Korean Armistice Agreement on July 27, 1953

A Texas-Sized Problem For General Clark

The difficulties faced at Salerno would foreshadow the rest of Clark’s experience in war.  But in one particular battle, Clark’s decisions would lead to the virtual annihilation of the 36th Infantry Division also known as the “Texas” Division since it was comprised primarily of men from the Texas National Guard.   General Clark sent the 36th “Texas” Division across the Gari River in what would become known as the Battle of Rapido River in January of 1944.

The crossing was off to a rocky start as, despite the fact that the river was unusually swollen and moving at a very rapid pace, General Clark ordered the attack.  When the 36th made it across, the Germans were waiting for them, and the result was devastating for the Texas men of the 36th.

After two days of fighting, the survivors retreated across the river in defeat with over 1,300 men killed or wounded and another 700 plus captured by the Germans.  It was one of the worst disasters for the US military in World War 2.  The Germans, on the other hand, are thought to have only lost about 65 men killed.

Litter bearers extracting casualties from the Battle of Rapido River via commons.wikimedia.org
Litter bearers extracting casualties from the Battle of Rapido River

General Clark would go on to finish the war, but not without additional controversy regarding his decisions. After the war, his actions at the Battle of Rapido River would be the subject of a Congressional inquiry pressed on by none other than representatives from Texas.

While General Clark was absolved of blame for the disaster, Texas never quite forgave him for the desolation of their beloved 36th.  General Clark would continue his career, eventually serving as the Far East Commander at the end of the Korean War.

History will debate whether this man was truly out of his league or just a common Army officer tasked with learning as they go in a rapidly expanded Army, the people of Texas have their minds made up about it.

Jeff Edwards

Jeff Edwards is one of the authors writing for WAR HISTORY ONLINE