When it comes to the Second World War, France is often made the butt of the joke for its surrender to Germany in 1940. However, the country certainly wasn’t the only one to underperform during the conflict. While Italy didn’t surrender to the Allies until September 1943, it was another European power that failed to meets expectations.
Why did Italy perform so poorly during the war? While the answer is rather complicated, there are seven factors that played a role, prompting the country’s subsequent need to surrender.
The Italians had outdated and minimal weaponry
The main problem the Italian Army had when it came to weaponry was that its troops were still using equipment that dated back to the First World War. In theory, this was fine, as other countries were also using older weapons at the beginning of the conflict, but, in practice, it put them behind most.
Most nations had either made improvements to their older weapons or scrapped them altogether soon after the fighting began. In contrast, Italy had no aircraft carriers, frequently used biplanes to fill the ranks of its Air Force and stuck its Army with tanks that simply couldn’t compete with the newer, more heavily-armored ones deployed by the Allies.
When Italy first entered the war, its forces used horse-drawn artillery and rifles that predated World War I. While other countries had worked to develop improved heavy tanks, the Italians hadn’t and relied solely on light and medium tanks. As well, not only was the country’s equipment outdated, there also wasn’t enough to effectively compete with the Allied forces.
Italian industry wasn’t prepared for war
Even if Italy had wanted to mass produce new weapons, its industry simply wouldn’t have been able to. Before World War II began, Under Secretary for War Production Carlo Favagrossa estimated the country’s military wouldn’t be able to engage in operations until October 1942.
This concern was acknowledged when Italy and Germany signed the Pact of Steel in May 1939, under which both agreed neither would go to war before 1943. This, evidently, was not upheld. When the Second World War broke out in 1939, Italy was still over three years away from being in a place where it could effectively fight.
Nevertheless, the nation joined the fight one year later, shortly before the fall of France. Later, Italian industry was unable to meet production demands, as the Allies had heavily bombed northern factories during raids and raw materials were difficult to access.
The Italian Army was made up of poorly-trained troops
As common as it is to see the Italian forces portrayed as inept during the Second World War, there is a ring of truth to that belief. Prior to the war, the Italian military had already been weakened by its involvement in conflicts with Ethiopia, Spain and Albania. There wasn’t enough money to properly train additional troops, causing many to learn while actively fighting on the frontlines.
Although Italian law dictated new recruits with the Royal Italian Army be trained for 18 months prior to combat, it was common for them to receive significantly less than that. Prime Minister Benito Mussolini commanded an impressive number of soldiers, roughly 200,000, but between their poor training and outdated equipment, they weren’t as effective as one would expect.
The majority of soldiers were unprepared for battle
The Italian forces were severely underprepared for battle. Officials were sure the conflict would come to a close shortly after France surrendered and, as such, the country’s military was poorly equipped for drawn-out offensives. However, it soon became obvious this wasn’t the case. This became most evident when Mussolini ordered troops into a poorly-fought conflict with Greece.
Greece was supposed to be a relatively easy conquest, but the Italians were met with difficult terrain and were without enough clothing or equipment, resulting in a high number of casualties. These factors also impacted morale, which is often considered to be another factor behind Italy’s loss to the Greek forces.
Ineffective supply lines
Outside of Greece, Italian troops were sent to fight in North and East Africa. One of the main issues they faced were ineffective supply lines. In order to reach troops, supplies had to be shipped across the Mediterranean, which was just another battle ground for the Allied and Axis powers.
There were large numbers of British naval ships patroling the Mediterranean, with many based at strategic harbors in Gibraltar and Malta. This made it difficult for the Italians to get their supplies through to Africa. They weren’t the only ones, however, to face such issues. The German forces also struggled with adequate supply lines during this time.
Bad military leadership
As a leader, Mussolini’s methods for military management were heavily flawed. He would promote his officers based solely on their dedication to Fascism, rather than any real skill, and would actively discourage them from questioning him or providing unsolicited advice. This led to the Italian Army being led by individuals who weren’t necessarily the best fit for the job.
Mussolini’s leadership was so poor throughout the war that he was voted out of power on July 25, 1943. One of the reasons for this was the heavy military losses the country had suffered; his leadership had brought them on the verge of military disaster.
Italy was in severe debt
While Italy struggled with a number of issues throughout the Second World War, the country’s financial position was arguably one of the most impactful. The aforementioned conflicts in Ethiopia, Spain and Albania had not only weakened Italy’s fighting force, but also had a drastic impact on the country’s financial capabilities.
More from us: How Norwegian Commandos Sabotaged Germany’s Atomic Bomb Research
To fund their involvement in these earlier conflicts, Italy had raised money from citizens. With the Second World War beginning only a few years after the conclusion of the Second Italo-Ethiopian War, the country had no money left. Without the appropriate funds, there wasn’t enough for large-scale industrial improvements, let alone the manufacturing of new weapons or the training of soldiers.